1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 144 Cal.App.2d
  5. 144 Cal.App.2d 617 (1956)
 

PEERLESS CAS. CO. v. CONTINENTAL CAS. CO.

Docket No. 16741.

144 Cal.App.2d 617 (1956)

301 P.2d 602

PEERLESS CASUALTY COMPANY (a Corporation), Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant; PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. (a Corporation) et al., Cross-Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

September 25, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carroll, Davis & Burdick for Appellant.

Weinstock, Anderson, Maloney & Chase, Sidney L. Weinstock and John R. Maloney, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Bledsoe, Smith & Cathcart and Wilbur J. Russ for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Hancock, Elkington & Rothert for Cross-Defendants and Respondents.

THE COURT.

In this case we granted a rehearing for the sole purpose of giving further consideration to the question whether one excess insurance policy of the Underwriters at Lloyd's should to some extent contribute in the loss here involved, with respect to which point Lamb v. Belt Cas. Co., 3 Cal.App.2d 624 [40 P.2d 311] was called to our attention by the petition for rehearing only. Thereafter Oil Base, Inc. v. Transport Indem. Co.,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases