BRAATZ v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO.


272 Wis. 479 (1956)

BRAATZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, vs. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and another, Defendants: MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, MUTUAL, and another, Defendants and Respondents. [Two cases.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 3, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Alan Shafrin of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by D. J. Regan of Milwaukee.


STEINLE, J.

The trial court was of a mind that the jury's findings were against the preponderance of the evidence, and, principally on that ground, directed that the verdict be set aside. Appellants contend that the trial court was in error in discarding the verdict on such basis. They maintain that the proper test in determining a motion to set aside a verdict is whether there was any credible evidence which supported the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases