FELTON, C. J.
The defendant contends that the plaintiff's son became enrolled in and admitted to the academy, and that under the terms of the school catalog the plaintiff was not entitled to a refund of the tuition paid. The specific provisions of the catalog relied on by the defendant is as follows: "It is a condition upon which a Cadet is admitted that he remain in the Academy until the end of the academic year. As the engagement of teachers and other provisions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
