GEHL, J.
The trial court based its conclusion upon the theory that because, as appears from the allegations of the amended complaint, the corporation plaintiff seeks damages for the interference by defendants with its mail, in which matter the individual plaintiffs have no interest, there is an improper joinder of causes of action.
"The test of whether there is more than one cause of action stated or attempted to be stated in a complaint is not
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.