PECK v. PECK


272 Wis. 466 (1956)

PECK, Respondent, vs. PECK, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 3, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Baumblatt & Goodman of Racine, and oral argument by L. P. Baumblatt.

For the respondent there was a brief by Nettie E. Karcher of Burlington, attorney, and Heft, Brown, Stewart & Coates of Racine of counsel, and oral argument by Carroll R. Heft.


CURRIE, J.

Sec. 247.24, Stats., provides that the court in rendering a judgment of divorce "may make such further provisions therein as it shall deem just and proper concerning the care, custody, maintenance, and education of the minor children of the parties." (Italics supplied.)

There seems to be very little case law in Wisconsin interpreting the quoted provision of this statute as applied to a father...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases