1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 23 N.J.
  5. 23 N.J. 50 (1956)
 

ASBURY PARK PRESS, INC. v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK

23 N.J. 50 (1956)

127 A.2d 401

ASBURY PARK PRESS, INC., AND WAYNE D. McMURRAY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND BEACH AMUSEMENT COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 10, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Novogrod argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Goldstein & Novogrod, attorneys; Mr. William Miller, on the brief).

Mr. John E. Toolan argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Beach Amusement Company (Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys).

Mr. Sidney J. Meistrich argued the cause for the defendant-respondent City of Asbury Park.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

In Asbury Park Press v. City of Asbury Park, 19 N.J. 183 (1955), this court held that the leasing of beachfront properties of municipalities bordering the Atlantic Ocean could only be accomplished through advertisement and competitive bidding. R.S. 40:61-36 et seq. The instant case presents two of the same antagonists...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases