1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 292 P.2d
  5. 292 P.2d 417 (1956)
 

DORRIS v. HAWK

No. 36852.

292 P.2d 417 (1956)

Claude DORRIS, Bob Tanner, E.Z. Mace, Mrs. Charles W. Duke, Willis L. Moore, Leona Banks, Gertrude Proffitt, Charles A. Reed, Phil Coon, C.J. Sharp, Jack T. Alexander and Florence Caughron, Plaintiffs in Error, v. W.M. HAWK, Hawk Dairies, a Corporation, Hawk's Hometown Ice Cream, a Corporation, and City of Tulsa, a Municipal Corporation, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

January 17, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ladner & Livingston, Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.

Joe B. Houston, Gerald B. Klein, James P. Melone, R.L. Davidson, Jr., Tulsa, for defendants in error, W.M. Hawk & Hawk Dairies.

T.A. Landrith, Jr., City Atty., Edmund Lashley, Tulsa, for defendant in error, City of Tulsa, a Munc. Corp.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, brought this action to enjoin the use of certain premises in violation of the zoning ordinance of the City of Tulsa. One of the defendants, Hawk Dairies, a corporation, after the institution of the action, dedicated the premises to the city as an alley and public way. The deed of dedication was presented to the Metropolitan Area Planning Commission and accepted. It was thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases