MUCKUS v. RUGGLES

No. 34764.

165 Ohio St. 540 (1956)

MUCKUS, APPELLANT, v. RUGGLES, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 21, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Francis P. Cotruvo, for appellant.

Mr. Frank M. Enright, for appellee.


WEYGANDT, C. J.

The sole contention of the plaintiff is that the jury's verdict does not constitute an adequate basis for the trial court's judgment and that hence the court was in error in accepting the verdict and rendering judgment thereon.

At the threshold of this discussion it is important to observe that the plaintiff is confronted with several difficulties.

In the first place she is without a bill of exceptions. This, of course, leaves this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases