MUSCO v. PARES


2 A.D.2d 689 (1956)

Enrico Musco, Appellant, v. George Pares et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 11, 1956


Order dismissing the amended complaint for insufficiency unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

The motion which resulted in the order appealed from was apparently made pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. It was made, not only on the pleading attacked, but also on the original complaint, which had previously been dismissed, the papers submitted on the previous motion, and the decision of the Special Term therein....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases