PAUL v. NEECE

No. 35.

94 S.E.2d 596 (1956)

244 N.C. 565

N. F. PAUL v. C. H. NEECE.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 10, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry B. Brown, Elizabeth City, for defendant-appellant.

Norman & Rodman, Plymouth, for plaintiff-appellee.


WINBORNE, Chief Justice.

While the record shows that defendant, the appellant, assigned as error the denial of his motion, made when plaintiff first rested his case, and renewed at the close of all the evidence, for judgment as of nonsuit, these assignments of error are not set out in appellant's brief nor is reason or argument stated or authority cited in support thereof. Hence under Rule 28 of Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at page 562, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases