1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 91 S.E.2d
  5. 91 S.E.2d 599 (1956)
 

SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY v. SHUFORD

No. 162.

91 S.E.2d 599 (1956)

243 N.C. 635

SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, Inc. v. John O. (Jack) SHUFORD and wife, Ellen Holland Shuford.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 7, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Childs & Childs, Lincolnton, for appellant.

M. T. Leatherman, Lincolnton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the assignments of error brought forward by the appellant and argued in its brief, in our opinion, present no prejudicial error of sufficient merit to justify an order for a new trial.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases