Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Appellant claims that a child of a marriage is not in the same position as one of the contracting parties to a marriage so far as furnishing details of the marriage is concerned, that he may rely on the presumption of legitimacy, and that it is contrary to public policy to impose on a child the burden of demonstrating his legitimacy. The printed record contains neither the petition nor the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.