Defendant bound itself to pay royalties on 50,000 devices for the year in question. The agreement fails to state at what price the devices are to be sold, thus providing no basis for computing the 5% royalties plaintiff is entitled to under the contract. Whatever might be said about the infirmity of the agreement at its inception because no billing price was fixed or method of fixing it prescribed, this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
