1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 272 Wis.
  5. 272 Wis. 402 (1956)
 

MULLEN v. STOFFIELD

272 Wis. 402 (1956)

MULLEN, Appellant, vs. STOFFIELD and wife, Defendants: CAMP, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 6, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Arthur T. Spence, and oral argument by Mr. Spence and by Mr. L. William Connolly, Jr., both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Peter J. Kondos, and oral argument by Mr. John A. Pfannerstill and by Mr. Mark M. Camp, in pro. per., all of Milwaukee.

BROWN, J.

There is no bill of exceptions and our review is confined to the pleadings, the findings of fact made by the trial court, and the judgment.

From the pleadings it appears that Mr. and Mrs. Stoffield had been adjudged indebted to the United States for income taxes which, with penalties and interest amounted to some $82,000. The plaintiff is an attorney and he and the Stoffields entered into a written contract which begins:

"Articles of agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases