1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 164 Ohio
  5. 164 Ohio St. 493 (1956)
 

HUDOCK v. RY. CO.

No. 34357.

164 Ohio St. 493 (1956)

HUDOCK, APPELLEE, v. THE YOUNGSTOWN MUNICIPAL RY. CO., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 8, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Traxler & Beil, for appellee.

Messrs. Harrington, Huxley & Smith and Mr. Eldon S. Wright, for appellant.

MATTHIAS, J.

As stated by the defendant, the first question presented is whether evidence of dependency of the family or the unfortunate domestic situation of a plaintiff in a personal injury action is objectionable and inadmissible, and if so is it not mandatory for the trial court to grant a new trial where the verdict of the jury is found by that court to be excessive and where there is evidence to show the verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases