UNITED STATES v. LINEN SERVICE COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY

Crim. A. No. 107-55.

141 F.Supp. 511 (1956)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. LINEN SERVICE COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY et al., Defendants.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

June 1, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Owen, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Anti-Trust Division, New York City, for plaintiff.

Lorentz & Stamler, Jos. H. Stamler, Newark, N. J., for defendants.


MEANEY, District Judge.

The questions raised on the motion to quash subpoenae duces tecum are these: 1st, are the subpoenae too general in terms and not specifically indicative of the documents required; and 2nd, whether the subpoenae served on such of the parties as were partnerships are properly directed, and whether if the subpoenae are held to be valid, immunity will be granted to the partners, upon production of the records referred to in the subpoenae. In so...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases