ZAR v. ZAR


42 N.J. Super. 607 (1956)

127 A.2d 407

ELIZABETH FELDMAN ZAR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PAUL ZAR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 4, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miss Florence F. Forgotson argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. M. Marvin Soperstein argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

A few introductory comments will adequately explain the previous course of this litigation and the subjects of the present appeal. Mrs. Zar instituted the action in quest of a judgment for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The defendant in a filed answer denied generally the allegations of the complaint. Thereafter the defendant by means of a retraxit withdrew the answer but recorded an appearance confined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases