GLASS v. DE ROO

Patent Appeal No. 6298.

239 F.2d 402 (1956)

Frederick F. GLASS, Appellant, v. William C. DE ROO et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

November 30, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otis A. Earl, Kalamazoo, Mich., and Munson H. Lane, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Lloyd C. Root, John A. Marzall, and Marzall, Johnston, Cook & Root, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.

Before JOHNSON, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, WORLEY, and RICH, Associate Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellees. Appellees move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that appellant's reasons of appeal fail to raise any question on which this court has jurisdiction to pass.

Appellant bases his appeal on twelve reasons of appeal which it is unnecessary for us to set forth. Appellees, in moving to dismiss, have analyzed these reasons, pointing out...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases