CITY OF TULSA v. HODGE

No. 36753.

293 P.2d 344 (1956)

CITY OF TULSA, a municipal corporation, and Charles H. Clark, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Edna L. HODGE, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

January 31, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rucker, Tabor & Cox, by Gurney Cox, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error, Charles Clark.

T.A. Landrith, Jr., City Atty., Tulsa, by John W. Hager, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error, City of Tulsa.

Elton B. Hunt, W.L. Eagleton, James R. Eagleton and Jack I. Gaither, Tulsa, for defendant in error.


WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

This action was brought by Edna L. Hodge, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the City of Tulsa, Charles H. Clark and Robert W. Hodge for damages allegedly sustained as a result of an automobile collision. Upon trial of the action the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff against the defendants City of Tulsa and Charles H. Clark and judgment was rendered thereon from which said defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases