Appellant's contention is that he was placed in double jeopardy by reason of the following facts. He was tried in the Court of General Sessions of New York on an indictment containing four counts. 1. burglary third degree; 2. attempted grand larceny first degree; 3. possession of burglar's instruments after a prior conviction; 4. burglary third degree. Appellant was convicted on counts 1 and 4, but was acquitted on counts 2 and 3. When he was about to be sentenced an information...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
