IN RE ESTATE OF FRAZIER

No. 34600.

164 Ohio St. 462 (1956)

IN RE ESTATE OF FRAZIER: KARL, SUCCESSOR GUARDIAN, APPELLEE, v. FRAZIER, JR., FORMER GUARDIAN, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 11, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry L. Brover, for appellee.

Mr. A. R. Roman and Mr. A. L. Kearns, for appellant.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C. J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and BELL, JJ., concur.

TAFT, J., concurs for the reason that the claimed constitutional questions could have been but were not raised in the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases