IN RE FRANKEL


20 N.J. 588 (1956)

120 A.2d 603

IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES FRANKEL, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 13, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the rule: Mr. Harold H. Fisher, by designation of the court.

Contra: Mr. John E. Toolan (Mr. Sam Weiss, on the brief; Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

The respondent attorney-at-law, in practice at Asbury Park, was ruled to show cause why he should not be disbarred or disciplined for violations of sections 28 and 34 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, as found by the Honorable Lester A. Drenk, Judge of the County of Burlington, in a report made to this court under date of September 6, 1955, pursuant to a reference made June 23, 1955.

Judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases