KOHLER CO. v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.


272 Wis. 310 (1956)

KOHLER COMPANY, Appellant, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 6, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Lyman C. Conger and Edward J. Hammer, both of Kohler.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by Austin T. Thorson and Arnold J. Spencer, both of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Thorson.

For the individual respondents there was a brief by Max Raskin of Milwaukee, and David Rabinovitz of Sheboygan, and oral argument by Mr. Raskin.


BROADFOOT, J.

Upon these appeals, which were consolidated for hearing, the plaintiff makes two main contentions. The first is that the commission based its decisions on several errors of law rather than upon findings of fact. The second contention is that there is no credible evidence to support the commission's finding that the discharged employees were sick and that the record as a whole renders incredible the testimony of the employees that they were sick.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases