HAITH v. FOX

No. 1805.

123 A.2d 459 (1956)

Raymond T. HAITH, Appellant, v. Patricia E. FOX, Appellee.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided June 18, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond T. Haith, pro se.

Charles S. Iversen, Washington, D.C., with whom James A. Willey and James A. Crooks, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.


QUINN, Associate Judge.

The only question presented is whether there was substantial compliance with a stipulation to settle the case. The facts are these: Appellant, hereinafter called defendant, was sued for $131.90 in connection with an automobile collision. He answered and filed a counterclaim in the amount of $40. Before trial the parties entered into a settlement stipulation which was filed with the court, wherein it was agreed that defendant would pay $70 on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases