1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 94 S.E.2d
  5. 94 S.E.2d 486 (1956)
 

CONNER v. UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY

No. 167.

94 S.E.2d 486 (1956)

244 N.C. 516

Joe M. CONNER, Employee, v. UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY, Employer, Self-Insurer.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 26, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamrick & Hamrick, Rutherfordton, for plaintiff, appellant.

Mullen, Holland & Cooke, Gastonia, for defendant, appellee.

DENNY, Justice.

The plaintiff took no exception to any of the findings of fact set out in the statement of facts herein. Exceptions to other findings were entered, which the court below held were supported by competent evidence.

In the instant case, however, as in Worsley v. S. & W. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E.2d 467 and in Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases