YOUNG v. BULLITT

Patent Appeal No. 6202.

233 F.2d 347 (1956)

Donald M. YOUNG and William N. Stoops, Appellants, v. Orville H. BULLITT, Jr., Appellee.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 15, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Kelton, New York City (Paul A. Rose, Washington, D. C., David A. Woodcock, Charles E. Howson, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

J. M. Castle, Jr., and A. Newton Huff, Wilmington, Del., for appellee.

Before JOHNSON, Acting Chief Judge, and WORLEY and JACKSON (retired), Judges.


WORLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the subject matter to the senior party Bullitt, appellee here. The interfering subject matter is defined in the single count as follows:

A fluorinated acyl peroxide having the formula

Bullitt is a patentee, but since the application of the junior party, Young and Stoops, was copending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases