MAGEE v. RIFKIND


13 Misc.2d 563 (1956)

James W. Magee et al., Appellants, v. Julian Rifkind et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 14, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Schwalb for appellants.

Murray M. Zoberg and Merrill Charlton for respondents.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, HECHT and AURELIO, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The court did not specify the grounds on which the motion for a new trial was made and the grounds on which it was decided in the order vacating the judgment after trial and ordering a new trial; no opinion or memorandum was rendered in connection with the motion and such grounds are not indicated in any way. The order, therefore, fails to comply with the requirements of rule 224 of the Rules of Civil Practice (Morris v. Phillips, 48 N.Y...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases