GUY v. FURMAN


4 Misc.2d 564 (1956)

Adria Guy, Respondent, v. Mary Furman, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 12, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Minkoff for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, EDER and HECHT, JR., JJ.


Per Curiam.

This proceeding should have been dismissed for failure to give the notice required by section 53 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations (see Frankel v. Rost, 272 App. Div. 334). But, in any event, such dismissal was surely required upon tenant's cross motion to set aside the final order in landlord's favor, when uncontradicted documentary proof was presented that landlord had accepted rent between the time of said notice and the commencement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases