1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 42 N.J.
  5. 42 N.J. Super. 514 (1956)
 

FINN v. GLICK

42 N.J. Super. 514 (1956)

127 A.2d 204

VINCENT J. FINN AND CATHERINE T. FINN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. PHILIP GLICK AND KURT ROSTAN, TRADING AS GLICK & ROSTAN, AND GEORGE TEMPLE AND MRS. GEORGE TEMPLE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 29, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Wilfred B. Wolcott argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Albert G. Driver, on the brief).

Mr. George A. Streitz argued the cause for defendants-appellants.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

Defendants, Philip Glick and Kurt Rostan, trading as Glick & Rostan, and Mr. and Mrs. George Temple, appeal from a judgment entered in the Chancery Division by the Hon. Vincent S. Haneman, granting plaintiffs, Vincent J. Finn and Catherine T. Finn, his wife, specific performance of a contract.

In February 1951 Glick & Rostan and plaintiffs signed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases