1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 235 F.2d
  5. 235 F.2d 319 (1956)
 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. F. W. WOOLWORTH CO.

No. 14577.

235 F.2d 319 (1956)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. F. W. WOOLWORTH CO., Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 25, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Edward D. Friedman, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Daniel J. Harrington, Atty., N. L. R. B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Davies, Hardy & Schenck, Christopher W. Hoey, New York City, George O. Bahrs, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before STEPHENS, FEE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Herein we have a question of whether the Woolworth Company must furnish certain payroll information to a representative of a clerk's union (hereafter called "local"), the collective bargaining agent for the employees of the company's store at San Bernardino, Calif.

The demand was for names, hours and wages of employees over a period immediately preceding the demand. The Woolworth Company refused and refuses to supply the requested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases