DIRENZO v. CAVALIER

No. 34731.

165 Ohio St. 386 (1956)

DIRENZO, APPELLEE, v. CAVALIER, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 20, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Morris Mendelssohn and Messrs. Falls, Hazel & Kerr, for appellee.

Mr. William E. Pfau and Mr. William E. Pfau, Jr., for appellant.


BELL, J.

The sole question to be decided here is whether Conti was occupying this ballroom under a lease or a license.

Counsel for defendant, in contending that the agreement herein constituted a lease, relies chiefly on the following definition of a tenant as approved by this court in Pitts v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority, 160 Ohio St. 129, 137, 113 N.E.2d 869:

"A tenant, including...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases