1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 5 Misc.2d
  5. 5 Misc.2d 542 (1956)
 

MINTZ v. MINTZ

5 Misc.2d 542 (1956)

Elizabeth Mintz, Appellant, v. Nelson E. Mintz, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

October 18, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome S. Zurkow for appellant.

Francis Kneitel for respondent.

EDER, HECHT and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

In addition to the reasons given below for denial of the motion, it should be pointed out that this is an opposite sort of situation from that involved in Nichols v. Nichols (306 N.Y. 490) where the support provisions for the wife and children were "unitary and unallocated" and the court refused "to do what the parties had failed to do, that is, apportion the total sum" (p. 497). Here the agreement explicitly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases