1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 137 F.Supp.
  5. 137 F.Supp. 409 (1956)
 

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA v. UNITED STATES

No. Cong. 1-53.

137 F.Supp. 409 (1956)

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

January 31, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray T. Sullivan, Jr., Riverside, Cal., and Robert F. Klepinger, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Herbert Pittle, Washington, D. C., with whom was Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and LARAMORE, Judges.

JONES, Chief Judge.

This case comes before the court pursuant to House Resolution 215, 83d Congress, 1st Session, adopted May 19, 1953, which provides as follows:

"Resolved, That the bill (H.R. 2294) entitled `A bill for the relief of the County of Riverside, California', together with all accompanying papers, is hereby referred to the United States Court of Claims pursuant to sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code; and said court shall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases