BRYANT v. STATE

36364.

94 Ga. App. 435 (1956)

95 S.E.2d 286

BRYANT v. THE STATE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided September 25, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ford & Houston, for plaintiff in error.

W. J. Forehand, Solicitor-General, Robert B. Williamson, contra.


TOWNSEND, J.

1. "The offenses of making a forged instrument and uttering the same are separate and distinct, although knowledge that an instrument is forged is an essential ingredient of the crime of uttering." Rowland v. State, 90 Ga.App. 742, 743 (84 S. E. 209).

2. The offense of altering a receipt for payment so as to make it purport to be a receipt for a larger amount than was in fact received and acknowledged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases