STATE v. BARHAM

No. 433.

92 S.E.2d 434 (1956)

244 N.C. 80

STATE v. Charlie Berry BARHAM, Jr.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 2, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. William B. Rodman, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. Claude L. Love, for the State.

W. Brantley Womble, Ellis Nassif, Raleigh, for defendant.


PER CURIAM.

The defendant seriously contends that the State's evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. A careful consideration of the evidence, however, leads us to the conclusion that it is sufficient, and we so hold. Consequently, the assignments of error, in our opinion, present no prejudicial error that would justify disturbing the verdict rendered below.

No error.

JOHNSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases