1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 143 Conn.
  5. 143 Conn. 381 (1956)
 

WINSLOW v. ZONING BOARD

143 Conn. 381 (1956)

LINWOOD A. WINSLOW ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 16, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Macrides, with whom, on the brief, were Samuel Gordon and Sydney C. Perell, for the appellants (plaintiff).

Julius B. Kuriansky, with whom were Joseph T. McCue and, on the brief, Maurice J. Buckley, for the appellee (defendant Louis Paul in Stamford Corporation).

Arthur L. DiSesa, with whom, on the brief, was John M. Hanrahan, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

INGLIS, C. J., BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE and DALY, JS.

O'SULLIVAN, J.

The plaintiffs, four in number, are taxpaying residents of the city of Stamford. The three defendants are the zoning board, hereinafter called the board, Arthur V. Swinnerton, the board's enforcement officer, and the Louis Paul in Stamford Corporation. In 1954, the board amended § 14 of the zoning regulations of the city. The plaintiffs appealed from that action to the Court of Common Pleas. The court dismissed the appeal, and from that judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases