1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 236 F.2d
  5. 236 F.2d 285 (1956)
 

MAGNUS HARMONICA CORPORATION v. LAPIN PRODUCTS

No. 351, Docket 23512.

236 F.2d 285 (1956)

MAGNUS HARMONICA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAPIN PRODUCTS, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided August 3, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burgess, Ryan & Hicks, New York City, Edward A. Haight, Chicago, Ill. (H. H. Hamilton, Reginald Hicks and John F. Ryan, New York City, of counsel, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Harry Price, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Before MEDINA, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge.

The question raised by this appeal is the validity of two patents relating to the construction of harmonica reeds and reed plates. Plaintiff is the assignee of three patents issued to Finn H. Magnus: 2,373,129, 2,407,312 and 2,416,451; referred to as 129, 312 and 451. Patents 129 and 312 describe harmonica reed plates molded of plastic with integral reeds. They are substantially the same except that in patent 129 the reeds and reed plate are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases