1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 92 S.E.2d
  5. 92 S.E.2d 426 (1956)
 

STATE v. BAUCOM

No. 436.

92 S.E.2d 426 (1956)

244 N.C. 61

STATE v. Robert E. BAUCOM.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 2, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles B. Caudle, William B. Webb, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.

William B. Rodman, Jr., Atty. Gen., T. W. Bruton, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harvey W. Marcus, Staff Atty., Raleigh, for the State.

WINBORNE, Justice.

This criminal prosecution in the Superior Court is upon a bill of indictment, and not upon the warrant. Therefore, this is the basic question for decision on this appeal. It appearing upon the face of the record of the bill of indictment that the offense for which defendant stands indicted was committed on a date less than six months prior to the date the bill of indictment was returned by the grand jury a true bill, did the Superior Court of Union...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases