MTR. OF DIOCESE OF ROCHESTER v. PLAN. BD.


1 N.Y.2d 508 (1956)

In the Matter of the Diocese of Rochester et al., Appellants, v. Planning Board of Town of Brighton et al., Respondents, and John C. Romano et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 11, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Porter R. Chandler and David H. Shearer for appellants.

Leo Pfeffer, Will Maslow and Shad Polier for American Jewish Congress, amicus curiæ, in support of appellants' position.

Charles J. Tobin, Jr., for New York State Catholic Welfare Committee, amicus curiæ, in support of appellants' position.

Andrew L. Gilman and Harold S. Coyle for respondents.

William F. Strang for intervenors-respondents.

CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BURKE, JJ., concur with FROESSEL, J.; VAN VOORHIS, J., dissents and votes to affirm in an opinion.


FROESSEL, J.

This is an appeal pursuant to leave of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, from an order of that court which unanimously affirmed an order, entered in an article 78 proceeding, of Special Term, Monroe County. Special Term dismissed the petition on the merits on the ground that no triable issue of fact had been raised, and affirmed respondents' decisions denying petitioners' application for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases