POLLOCK v. POLLOCK


273 Wis. 233 (1956)

POLLOCK, Respondent, vs. POLLOCK, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 5, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Godfrey & Godfrey of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Alfred L. Godfrey.

For the respondent there was a brief by Kenney, Korf & Pfeil of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Richard H. Pfeil.


STEINLE, J.

The principal questions raised upon this appeal are as follows:

Did the court abuse its discretion in awarding the custody of the minor child of the parties to the respondent, Audree Pollock?

Is the order of the court divesting respondent of the custody after August 31, 1960, invalid?

Was the trial court without power to adjudicate alimony in this action, the Washington court's divorce decree being silent as to alimony?

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases