RICHMAN v. NEUBERGER


22 N.J. 28 (1956)

123 A.2d 217

GROVER C. RICHMAN, JR., ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KATHERINE K. NEUBERGER, HALSEY W. STICKEL, HARRISON L. TODD AND EVELYN M. SEUFERT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 13, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold Kolovsky, Assistant Attorney-General, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Evelyn M. Seufert.

Mr. Walter H. Jones argued the cause as amicus curiae for the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey.


The opinion of the court was delivered by VANDERBILT, C.J.

This action in lieu of a prerogative writ was brought by the Attorney-General of New Jersey to test the validity of the extension by the Legislature of the term in office of the defendants as members of the Law Enforcement Council, who had been appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate, and seeking their ouster from office. From an adverse determination on his motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases