DOSTAL v. MAGEE


273 Wis. 228 (1956)

DOSTAL, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Appellants, vs. MAGEE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 5, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Doar & Knowles of New Richmond, and oral argument by John Doar.

For the respondent there was a brief by Gwin & Petersen of Hudson, and oral argument by Wendell A. Petersen.


GEHL, J.

The plaintiffs concede frankly that our conclusion in Martin v. Lindner (1950), 258 Wis. 29, 44 N.W.2d 558, is against them. They contend, however, that in some of our recent cases we have displayed a tendency to construe the provisions of sec. 330.19 (5), Stats., quite liberally in favor of claimants and suggest that we continue on that course and thereby find a means of accommodating them. They contend that sec....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases