1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 138 Cal.App.2d
  5. 138 Cal.App.2d 360 (1956)
 

WRIGHT v. TATE

Docket No. 8682.

138 Cal.App.2d 360 (1956)

291 P.2d 984

MAUDE WRIGHT et al., Respondents, v. EMMETT LEE TATE et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

January 9, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto Adolph Pahl, in pro. per., for Appellants.

Huberty & Huberty for Respondents.

SCHOTTKY, J.

Plaintiffs commenced an action against defendants for damages and to enjoin defendants from committing further acts of trespass. The complaint alleged that plaintiffs were the owners in fee simple of certain real property in Calaveras County, except as to minerals and mineral rights in one 160-acre parcel thereof. The complaint alleged further that the defendants committed various acts of trespass, including the removal of a fence and the opening of gates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases