TRUCK INS. EXCH. v. ROCHESTER INS. CO.


8 Misc.2d 489 (1956)

Truck Insurance Exchange, Plaintiff, v. Rochester American Insurance Company, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Onondaga County.

September 24, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hancock, Dorr, Ryan & Shove for defendant.

Mackenzie, Smith, Lewis, Michell & Hughes for plaintiff.


HENRY A. HUDSON, J.

The defendant has moved pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint alleges that both plaintiff and defendant are liability insurance companies carrying automobile liability insurance upon the same assured; that the insured automobile was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases