PER CURIAM.
The appellant was convicted of shooting and wounding another in sudden heat and passion. His punishment was fixed at one year in jail and a fine of $500. He seeks a reversal of the judgment on the grounds that (1) his plea of former jeopardy should have been sustained, and (2) his substantial rights were prejudiced by alleged improper arguments made by the prosecuting attorney in his closing argument to the jury.
We think the plea of former jeopardy...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
