1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 206 Or.
  5. 206 Or. 285 (1956)
 

BATY ET AL v. MACKEN ET UX

206 Or. 285 (1956)

292 P.2d 489

BATY ET AL v. MACKEN ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 25, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brazier C. Small, of Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Osterman & Williams, of Salem.

R.W. Pickell, of Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, LUSK and BRAND, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

TOOZE, J.

This action was brought by William H. Baty and Motors Insurance Corporation, as plaintiffs, against J.K. Macken and Dorothy Macken, as defendants, to recover for property damage to and loss of use of an automobile allegedly caused by the negligent operation of defendants' motor vehicle by the defendant Dorothy Macken. A verdict was returned in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $632.92, and judgment was entered accordingly. Defendants' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases