1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 46 Cal.2d
  5. 46 Cal.2d 444 (1956)
 

BURKE v. CHROSTOWSKI

Docket No. L.A. 23979.

46 Cal.2d 444 (1956)

296 P.2d 545

THOMAS BURKE et al., Appellants, v. STANLEY M. CHROSTOWSKI, Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 4, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry M. Irwin for Appellants.

Joseph L. Graves for Respondent.

SPENCE, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action between partners following the dissolution of the partnership. Their principal contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the trial court's findings which resulted in the denial of their alleged claim of $2,500 upon settlement of the partnership affairs. [1] In determining this question, it is well settled that "an appellate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases