1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 41 N.J.
  5. 41 N.J. Super. 445 (1956)
 

STATE v. TORRANCE

41 N.J. Super. 445 (1956)

125 A.2d 403

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM R. TORRANCE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 21, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William W. Wimmer argued the cause for the defendant-appellant-respondent.

Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent-appellant (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of the State of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

Cross-appeals, here consolidated, were taken from an order of the Superior Court holding the indictment to be duplicitous in that it combined several offenses in a single count, but denying the defendant's motion to dismiss and granting leave to the State to amend in order to remedy the defect.

The defendant, William R. Torrance, was indicted by the Hudson County grand jury alleging a violation of

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases