1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 207 Or.
  5. 207 Or. 279 (1956)
 

HINDMAN v. COY

207 Or. 279 (1956)

295 P.2d 1097

HINDMAN v. COY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 18, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl A. Fewless argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Yunker, Fewless & Hannam, Portland.

Herbert M. Schwab argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dusenberry, Teiser, Martin & Schwab, Portland.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, LUSK and BRAND, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle, brought by Jack W. Hindman, as plaintiff, against Elsie May Coy, as defendant. The jury returned a verdict for defendant, and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiff appeals.

Southeast Sandy boulevard is an arterial highway extending in a general northeasterly and southwesterly direction in the city...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases