WINDECKER v. FEIGEL

No. 17684.

292 P.2d 187 (1956)

Fred WINDECKER and Marjorie Windecker, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Chas. W. V. FEIGEL, Henry Symanski, Mary V. Symanski, and The Mercantile Bank & Trust Company, a banking corporation, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied January 30, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert E. Mann, Greeley, for plaintiffs in error.

Joseph L. Morrato, Boulder, for defendants in error Symanskis.

Dudley I. Hutchinson, Jr., T. Henry Hutchinson, Dudley I. Hutchinson, Sr., Boulder, for defendants in error Feigel and Mercantile Bank & Trust Co.


MOORE, Justice.

Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the trial court and we will hereinafter refer to them as plaintiffs. For the reason that defendants in error have very different connections with the case we will refer to them by name.

Plaintiffs desired to buy a house and the ground immediately surrounding it. They went to the office of defendant Feigel in Boulder, who was the authorized agent and attorney for Ruby Brierley the owner. Feigel had no legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases